An illuminating piece of work involved our identifying character traits in ourselves and using these to settle into groups. I wasn't surprised to find myself sitting amongst reference librarians in the "Analysts" corner: a lot of the chafing between me and them is down to a conflict of similarities after all. Frog and Salome found themselves representing "Artistes" - extrovert performers who do things and think about them afterwards, if necessary. Nearly everyone else gathered in the "Sociable" corner - friendly, non-confrontational consensus-seekers. And there, sitting on her own, was Maybelle: the one and only "Driver" in the room.
"I'm Billy No-mates," she complained.
"Well," we explained, "if you will want to do things..."
5 comments:
I suppose doing things must be a bit infra dig in a library. (Or am I being too harsh?)
Sadly spot-on old lad.
"...extrovert performers who do things and think about them afterwards, if necessary"
I like how you've added the "...if necessary". Is that the UK way of saying, as we do in North America, "Shoot first and ask questions later".
Not that I am endorsing gunfire or weaponry, by the way.
I dislike any sort of 'team building' exercises, and categorizing people according to a single so-called trait, strikes me as non-useful and non-productive. Can one not be both analytical and sociable?
No,"I'm Billy No-mates" ...no, "I'm Billy No-mates" no, "I'm Billy No-mates" "I am Billy No-mates" no, "I'm Billy No-mates"...
Flay them all!
Lavinia: I'm distrustful of the labelling games. It's useful to demonstrate that different people think, act and learn in different ways, so one-size fits all doesn't work, but I think it's sensible to move on quickly from there.
"...extrovert performers who do things and think about them afterwards, if necessary" means: "Oh shit, how did that happen?" (if that doesn't provoke Frog into commenting nothing will!)
Doctor Maroon: is the calm, rational voice of science, as always. (You don't work for our personnel department do you?)
Post a Comment